| Review of a live theatre production: Rubrics 4.0 An “A” paper will consistently meet all of the following criteria: Complete – incorporates all significant aspects of production into review. No presumption that the reader has experienced the event described. Clear – well-written, grammatical sentences using accurate descriptive words; presented in a logical sequence of ideas (proofread and corrected). Easy to read (word-processed unless handwriting is very legible). Supported – examples used throughout to illustrate observations and conclusions. Cites sources for others’ opinions and conclusions Detailed – very specific throughout, identifying names, locations, etc. Draws pictures with words for the reader to envision what is being referred to. Insightful – draws conclusions about the production based on reported observations. Makes connections between ideas/observations and similar notions from other works or aspects of the production Warning signs: Did you answer the 5 W’s in the first paragraph? “The Shenandoah Shakespeare Express performed ‘Romeo and Juliet’ last weekend at Robinson High School’s Russell Theatre in Fairfax to great fanfare—and proved once again that Shakespeare was meant to be seen live, not simply read aloud in class.” Vs. “This play was really excellent.” Did you include the stuff you search for when the review is of your show? When you refer to a character, tell us who played him/her. When you critique the lighting, mention the designer’s name (You…uh…did keep your program, didn’t you?). If you liked the set/actress/etc., specify what it was that did it for you! Did you draw a conclusion or merely voice a personal opinion? A conclusion will be true--according to your criteria—regardless of your opinion (“R&J” is a tragedy because the characters were drawn inescapably to their doom, not because it left you sad—nor could it be considered a comedy if you somehow found their fate enjoyable.) “The stage combat lacked realism; the actors moved so slowly that no suspense or tension was generated. We didn’t fear for the characters’ safety or believe their wounds.” Vs. “I didn’t like the fights.” A play may be completely successful at accomplishing its aims, yet not be your “cup of tea.” You mustn’t confuse your personal preferences with the recognition (or absence) of quality. “I only gave it two stars because I don’t like musicals” is an unfair assessment for a review. Your aim is to inform; let the information you provide let the reader draw their own conclusions about whether you liked the show or not…and whether they would like it, regardless of your preferences. Did you conclude, or end because you were at the bottom of the page?….??! “Another thing I liked was the costumes. The end.” Vs. “We certainly look forward to next fall’s return of the exciting Shenandoah Shakespeare Express.” 3 – Most of the criteria above are met 2 – Some of the criteria are met 1 – Few of the criteria are met 0 – None of the criteria are met Could you use some models to work from? Try www.theatrereviews.com and click on Broadway (or other). Read reviews in the Washington Post or Times. Read SEVERAL to see what they have in common. Read reviews from more than one reviewer. Note how the styles differ. Note the kinds of things everyone includes. Like any good writing, 1) Write your first draft from the heart (and write it HOT –that night, while it’s fresh in your mind--not ten days later, when it’s due) to get your genuine feeling for the play, and the details that inspired it, onto the paper. 2) Write your second draft from the head (correct the technical flaws, find just the right words, put in logical order, etc.) |